German law · English information
German insolvency courts are designated local courts (Amtsgerichte). Not every local court handles insolvency proceedings.
Identify the competent court
Section 3 InsO generally refers to the general venue, with the centre of an independent economic activity taking precedence where it is elsewhere. Cross-border cases additionally require assessment of international jurisdiction.
Court and administrator have different roles
The insolvency application is filed with the court. Insolvency claims are generally lodged with the appointed administrator or supervisor. The opening order sets out important deadlines, dates and contact details.
Appeals and public notices
Not every measure is separately appealable. Availability, standing and deadlines depend on the decision. Public notices may affect the calculation of time limits. Use official insolvency announcements and check the precise debtor, reference and date; unverified private directories should not be the sole basis for a payment or claim.
Related information
Procedures overview · Creditor rights · Corporate insolvency
Official German Insolvency Code · Official StaRUG
Practical implementation
Choose the correct recipient for the issue
The insolvency court, administrator and supervisor perform different functions. The opening order is an important source for the case reference, contacts and dates. Claims are generally filed with the appointed administrator or supervisor rather than through a general message to the court. Appeals and formal applications have separate requirements. A creditor should identify the actual legal entity and relevant registry details before sending documents to a proceeding involving a similarly named business.
Review notices, service and deadlines together
Official publication may have consequences for deadlines. An internet search does not replace examination of formal service and the applicable procedural rule. Different decisions may have different appeal routes. Admissibility, standing, time and form require assessment. A message to a law firm or administrator does not generally preserve a court deadline. Electronic filings must satisfy the relevant requirements, with evidence of receipt retained.
Four practical examples
The following scenarios are illustrative examples, not reports of client matters. The outcome depends on the facts and applicable rules.
Example 1: Several businesses have similar names
A creditor finds an online notice concerning a similarly named company. Registry information, address and contractual records should be compared. Filing in the wrong proceeding does not replace participation against the actual debtor.
Example 2: Invoices are sent only to the court
A supplier should check the opening order and designated filing route. Sending documents to any office associated with the case does not automatically constitute proper claim filing.
Example 3: An order is discovered late
A participant notices a publication after some time. Publication effects, service and appeal periods need individual review. The date of actual awareness is not necessarily the legal starting point.
Example 4: A payment instruction looks suspicious
A business receives purported insolvency payment details. The case reference, official contacts and recipient identity should be verified independently. An altered bank account should not be accepted solely on an unconfirmed email.
Discuss your situation
Tell us your role, the parties involved and any deadlines. We will check conflicts, agree the scope of the work and explain the fees before accepting instructions.